ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2026
Integrating in vitro aerosol characterization and cross-species PBPK modeling to predict human lung exposure of inhaled therapeutic proteins.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhalation therapy provides a rapid onset and avoids first-pass metabolism, making it a key non-invasive delivery strategy for therapeutic proteins. However, predicting pulmonary exposure is challenging due to aerosol properties and lung anatomy. This study is the first to construct an integrated in vitro aerosol characterization and cross-species extrapolation pulmonary physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for inhaled therapeutic proteins. Using recombinant human interferon-α1b (rhIFN-α1b) as a model drug, aerosol aerodynamic properties and delivery performance were evaluated at different concentrations (15-60 μg/mL) and inhalation devices (mouthpiece vs. facemask). The multiple path particle dosimetry (MPPD) model was used to predict particle deposition in the lungs. Further, a pulmonary PBPK model for rhIFN-α1b in mice and healthy adults was developed and validated through pharmacokinetic studies. Results showed that delivery efficiency decreased with concentration, and the mouthpiece outperformed the mask. MPPD simulations indicated that the mouthpiece reduced oropharyngeal retention and enhanced alveolar deposition. Larger particle sizes led to reduced alveolar deposition. The PBPK model accurately predicted rhIFN-α1b exposure in the lungs and serum of healthy adults, with 85% of C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.