ArticleDigital journal of ophthalmology : DJO2025
A simple mathematical approach to identifying baseline predictors of the effectiveness of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in intraocular pressure reduction.
Article in Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify mathematically the baseline physiological predictors of the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effectiveness of topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs). Materials and Methods: Assuming a steady state of aqueous humor flow, mathematical equations describing IOP were formulated by incorporating related physiological variables. Global sensitivity analysis was then performed, in which all variables were varied simultaneously across their clinically reported ranges. This computational approach quantified the percentage reduction in IOP achieved by CAIs and identified the key determinants underlying variability in their effectiveness. Results: A reduction in the solute influx via active transport by the ciliary epithelium, mediated by CAIs, was positively associated with the magnitude of IOP reduction. Among the physiological parameters in this model-trabecular outflow facility, uveoscleral outflow fraction, episcleral venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, plasma protein concentration, albumin/globulin ratio, and plasma osmolarity-a higher baseline trabecular outflow facility was the strongest predictor of reduced effectiveness of CAIs, in terms of the percentage of IOP reduction. Other baseline physiological parameters had no significant effect on the effectiveness of CAIs. Conclusions: Certain patient characteristics may be associated with compromised effectiveness of CAIs in terms of percentage IOP reduction. These characteristics, potentially associated with higher trabecular outflow facility, may include a lower baseline IOP or prior use of other trabecular outflow-enhancing medications before CAI initiation. Further studies are required to validate the clinical significance of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.