ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2026
From theoretical energy to practical utilization: interfacial stability, transport kinetics, and cell-level design in high-energy lithium-metal batteries.
Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lithium-metal batteries are widely regarded as one of the most promising routes toward cell-level energy densities beyond the limit of conventional graphite-based lithium-ion batteries. However, the practical energy delivered by a lithium-metal cell is not determined only by the theoretical capacity of the cathode or the low potential of lithium metal. In many cases, the accessible energy is gradually consumed by voltage decay, interfacial impedance growth, parasitic reactions, inactive component weight and incomplete utilization of thick electrodes. This review therefore focuses on the conversion of theoretical energy into practically deliverable full-cell energy rather than providing a broad survey of all high-energy lithium-metal battery chemistries. High-voltage layered oxides are discussed as representative systems for voltage preservation and cathode interfacial stabilization, while selected conversion cathodes are used to illustrate how sluggish reaction kinetics, mass transport limitations, and lean-electrolyte constraints reduce the utilization of high theoretical capacity. Lithium-metal anodes and pouch-cell design are further analyzed from the viewpoint of lithium inventory management and full-cell mass efficiency. By linking interfacial stability, transport kinetics, lithium reversibility, and cell-level design, this review emphasizes that practical energy density should be evaluated by retained capacity, average discharge voltage, electrolyte-to-capacity ratio, negative-to-positive electrode capacity ratio, areal capacity, and full-cell specific energy under realistic testing conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.