Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382243›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2026

Contrastive multi-view representation learning for multi-camera plant phenotyping: A cotton field study.

Daniel Petti, Changying Li, Ninghao Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel PettiBio-Sensing, Automation, and Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 1741 Museum Rd, Gainesville, 32603, Florida, USA.
Changying LiBio-Sensing, Automation, and Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 1741 Museum Rd, Gainesville, 32603, Florida, USA.
Ninghao LiuSchool of Computing, University of Georgia, 200 D. W. Brooks Drive, Georgia, Athens, 30602, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attempts to deploy computer vision in agricultural tasks often suffer from a shortage of annotated data. One strategy to alleviate the impact of limited data is Self-Supervised Learning (SSL), which involves pre-training a model on a pretext task that utilizes automatically generated annotations. The primary objective of this study is to leverage a multi-camera view dataset of cotton boll images for contrastive learning in order to enable phenotyping tasks with minimal data annotation. This dataset was collected in the field using six camera views. The efficacy of two contrastive learning frameworks (SimCLR and MoCo) in producing representations when positive examples originate from different cameras was investigated, and a comprehensive study of how the camera positions affect performance was conducted. After self-supervised pre-training, linear evaluation and semi-supervised learning experiments were performed on boll detection and plot status downstream tasks. In general, using multiple camera views with SimCLR and MoCo improves cotton boll detection mean average precision by

Indexed as

Contrastive learningCotton yield estimationHigh-throughput phenotypingMachine visionSelf-supervised learningUGV

Identifiers

PMID42382243
PMCPMC13316266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.