Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382238›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2026

InspectGaussian: Large-scale coarse-to-fine Gaussian reconstruction for orchard inspection robots.

Li Zhang, Zehan Bao, Hong Chen, Hanwen Kang, Weifu Li, Yaohui Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Li ZhangCollege of Information, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Zehan BaoCollege of Information, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Hong ChenCollege of Information, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Hanwen KangKernalMind Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Weifu LiCollege of Information, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yaohui ChenCollege of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient large-scale 3D reconstruction of orchard environments is essential for robotic inspection and precision agriculture, yet existing methods struggle with unstructured scenes, variable illumination, and computational bottlenecks. We propose InspectGaussian, a coarse-to-fine Gaussian reconstruction framework tailored for orchard inspection robots. The pipeline integrates an RGB-D-based data acquisition strategy using ORB-SLAM3, which is enhanced by a dense mapping module for robust large-scale pose estimation and point cloud generation. A divide-and-conquer strategy is then employed: individual plant views are extracted via a YOLO-World-based detection and 3D matching algorithm, followed by plant-specific reconstruction using an improved 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) method incorporating depth regularization and region-aware refinement. Experimental results in citrus orchards demonstrate that InspectGaussian achieves 96% average precision and 93% recall in plant view extraction, while surpassing state-of-the-art methods in reconstruction fidelity (31.226 PSNR, 0.915 SSIM, 0.067 LPIPS) and point cloud accuracy (7 mm error). These results confirm its effectiveness in capturing fine structural and textural details while maintaining scalability and efficiency. This framework provides a practical solution for high-throughput, in-field plant phenotyping and lays the foundation for intelligent orchard monitoring and management.

Indexed as

3D reconstructionDigital orchardNovel view synthesisObject detectionRobot inspectionSimultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)

Identifiers

PMID42382238
PMCPMC13316261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.