ArticleNature and science of sleep2026
Follow-up Study on the Sleep Status of Anti-Epidemic Staff: A Study Based on Wearable Sleep Trackers.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare sleep architecture, as estimated by a wearable pulse oximeter, between healthcare staff who worked in designated hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan and a control group, and across a one-year follow-up, and identify factors associated with insomnia risk in this population. Methods: Thirty healthcare professionals who worked in Wuhan during the initial COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 and 28 healthy control healthcare professionals who did not participate in epidemic control were recruited. All participants underwent one night of overnight sleep monitoring with a ring-shaped medical pulse oximeter. Psychological health conditions were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Self-reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20). A one-year follow-up, including repeat one-night sleep monitoring, was conducted for 28 of the anti-epidemic staff. Results: Twenty-eight anti-epidemic staff and 28 controls completed the study. The difference in total sleep time (TST) among the healthcare staff at the post-deployment assessment, the 1-year follow-up, and the control group was statistically significant (F=9.942, p<0.001). TST of the anti-epidemic group at the post-deployment assessment was significantly longer than that at the 1-year follow-up and that of the control group. A non-significant trend toward a relative decrease in the proportion of deep sleep was observed in the anti-epidemic group after 1 year (F=2.456, p=0.092). In an exploratory analysis, this trend appeared to be driven by a numerical decrease in deep sleep and a numerical increase in light sleep at the follow-up. In a logistic regression model, higher SRQ-20 score and older age were independently associated with increased risk of insomnia, while higher BMI and higher PHQ-9 score showed inverse associations. Conclusion: In this exploratory study, stress exposure may have a sustained impact on the sleep of healthcare staff. SRQ-20 score, age, BMI, and PHQ-9 score were independently associated with insomnia in this cohort. The application of wearable pulse oximeters may serve as a convenient tool for large-scale sleep health screening, but sleep architecture findings derived from these devices require confirmation by polysomnography and should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.