ArticleSafety and health at work2026
Noise-induced Hearing Loss Among Dental Personnel in a University Hospital: Occupational Noise Exposure and Lifestyle Factors - A Cross-sectional Analytical Study.
Article in Safety and health at work, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Occupational Dental Noise and Early Cochlear Changes: Evidence from Distortion Product Oto-Acoustic Emissions in Young Dentists.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sensorineural hearing loss is influenced by multiple factors, with occupational noise exposure being the key contributor. Dental personnel are routinely exposed to high-frequency sounds from clinical instruments. Although average clinic noise levels are typically below the 85 dBA threshold, cumulative exposure and high peak levels may increase the risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). This study assessed the workplace noise characteristics, prevalence, and risk factors for NIHL among dental personnel. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 184 staff members at a university dental hospital. Data collection included questionnaires, otoscopic examinations, pure-tone audiometry, and workplace noise measurements. Results: Hearing loss was identified in 30.4% of the participants. Individuals over 30 years of age and those who consumed tobacco and/or alcohol had significantly higher risks (odds ratio = 2.93, 5.81, and 3.21, respectively), whereas caffeine consumption showed a protective association. Technical and maintenance staffs were exposed to higher peak and high-frequency noise than clinical or administrative staff, with 8-h time-weighted averages ranging from 64.3 to 68.9 dBA-all below occupational noise exposure limits. Conclusion: Occupational noise exposure and lifestyle factors contributed to NIHL among dental personnel. Preventive strategies should integrate engineering controls to reduce peak noise alongside health promotion targeting modifiable risks such as tobacco and alcohol use. Early detection and implementation of hearing preservation strategies are essential to reduce the prevalence of NIHL in dental professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.