ArticleSafety and health at work2026
Adverse Impact of Nonstandard Working Hours on Mental Health: An Analysis Using Two-way Fixed Effects Model.
Article in Safety and health at work, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although several studies have demonstrated the adverse impacts of both longer and shorter working hours on workers' mental health, findings remain inconsistent. This study aimed to analyze the impacts of working hours on mental health and investigate how this relationship varies across subgroups. Methods: Using the 12th to 18th waves of the Republic of Korea Welfare Panel Study, we analyzed 29,025 observations from 7,415 individuals. Working hours were categorized as "<35 hours," "35-40 hours (standard)," "41-52 hours," and ">52 hours." Mental health outcomes included depressive symptoms, self-esteem, and subjective well-being. Two-way fixed effects models were used to analyze the causal associations between working hours, with subgroup analyses by gender, age, and employment type. Results: Compared to standard working hours, both reduced (<35 hours) and extended working hours (41-52 hours and >52 hours) were associated with adverse mental health outcomes. Depressive symptoms increased with reduced (estimate = 0.301) and extended hours (41-52 hours: estimate = 0.238; >52 hours: estimate = 0.283). Self-esteem decreased across all nonstandard categories (<35 hours: estimate = -0.266; 41-52 hours: estimate = -0.200; >52 hours: estimate = -0.214). Subjective well-being decreased with extended hours (41-52 hours: estimate = -0.054; >52 hours: estimate = -0.125). Extended hours were associated with adverse mental health across all groups, with stronger associations among women and younger adults. Women, older adults, and casual or fixed-term workers exhibited high vulnerability to the effects of reduced working hours. Conclusion: Our findings indicate a nonlinear relationship between working hours and mental health, with standard working hours demonstrating the most favorable outcomes. Differential impacts across demographic groups underscore the necessity for tailored policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.