ArticleSafety and health at work2026
Occupational Differences in Associations Between Korean Occupational Stress Scale Subscales and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Safety and health at work, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occupational stress is a major determinant of depression among workers. The Korean Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS) is widely used to assess psychosocial stressors in Korean workplaces through multiple subscales; however, its association to depression across different occupational groups has not been systematically evaluated. This review examined associations between KOSS subscales and depression, focusing on occupational differences in subscale association. Methods: PubMed and KoreaMed were searched through March 2024. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled odds ratios, and between-study heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q test and the I Results: Meta-analyses demonstrated significant associations between depression and most KOSS subscales, excluding the physical environment subscale, with substantial heterogeneity across studies. In qualitative synthesis, the pattern of significant subscales differed by occupational group, KOSS version, and analytic approach, indicating variability in subscale association across work settings. Conclusion: Several KOSS subscales, including insufficient job control, are associated with depression; however, their association varies by occupation and measurement context. These findings suggest that the KOSS may not fully capture key psychosocial stressors in certain occupational groups. Future revisions should incorporate occupation-specific items and clearer interpretive criteria to improve its applicability in occupational mental health research and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.