Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382197›Full record

ArticleSafety and health at work2026

Occupational Differences in Associations Between Korean Occupational Stress Scale Subscales and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Soo-Hyeon Kim, Hansoo Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety and health at work, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Soo-Hyeon KimChonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Hansoo SongDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Occupational stress is a major determinant of depression among workers. The Korean Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS) is widely used to assess psychosocial stressors in Korean workplaces through multiple subscales; however, its association to depression across different occupational groups has not been systematically evaluated. This review examined associations between KOSS subscales and depression, focusing on occupational differences in subscale association. Methods: PubMed and KoreaMed were searched through March 2024. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled odds ratios, and between-study heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q test and the I Results: Meta-analyses demonstrated significant associations between depression and most KOSS subscales, excluding the physical environment subscale, with substantial heterogeneity across studies. In qualitative synthesis, the pattern of significant subscales differed by occupational group, KOSS version, and analytic approach, indicating variability in subscale association across work settings. Conclusion: Several KOSS subscales, including insufficient job control, are associated with depression; however, their association varies by occupation and measurement context. These findings suggest that the KOSS may not fully capture key psychosocial stressors in certain occupational groups. Future revisions should incorporate occupation-specific items and clearer interpretive criteria to improve its applicability in occupational mental health research and practice.

Indexed as

DepressionMeta-analysisOccupational groupsOccupational stressSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42382197
PMCPMC13315989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.