ArticlePsychology of men & masculinity2026
Adversarial Heterosexual Beliefs Moderate the Effects of Daily Emotion Modulation and Sex Motives on Condom Use Resistance: A 32-Day Daily Diary Study Among Young Men.
Article in Psychology of men & masculinity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Condom use resistance (CUR), which involves tactics to obtain condomless sex with a partner who wishes to use condoms, is a common sexual risk behavior among heterosexual men. CUR is associated with physical and mental health consequences for those who experience it. Prior research has identified adversarial heterosexual beliefs (AHB) as a trait-level risk factor that increases the likelihood of CUR engagement. However, little is known about how AHB interact with daily factors (e.g., daily emotion modulation, sex motives) to influence CUR in real-life. The current study examined how the interaction between AHB and daily emotion modulation difficulties and power- and coping-related sex motives was associated with CUR engagement. Using data from daily reports among men who have sex with women, a multilevel logistic model revealed that men were more likely to engage in CUR if they had higher average coping sex motives over the 32-day period and on days with higher power-related sex motives. Significant cross-level interactions emerged between AHB and both emotion modulation difficulties and coping sex motives. On days with greater emotion modulation difficulty, men with higher AHB reported increased CUR behavior. On days with higher coping sex motives, men with lower AHB reported increased CUR behavior. Results suggest that AHB amplify risk when coupled with impaired emotion modulation, while maladaptive coping motives represent an alternative pathway to CUR among men lower in AHB. Findings underscore the importance of examining both trait cognitive risk factors and daily emotion regulation and sex motives in understanding sexual risk behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.