ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Understanding Practitioner Comfort and Educational Priorities for Safe Opioid Prescribing: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released revised opioid prescribing guidelines in 2022 to address unintended harms associated with its original 2016 guidelines and to emphasize individualized care, shared decision-making, and appropriate screening for opioid use disorder. The extent to which clinicians are aware of and feel prepared to apply these revised recommendations remains unclear. Methods: In a repeated cross-sectional study, we conducted an anonymized electronic survey of attendees to a nationally recognized annual opioid conference from 2022 to 2024 to assess familiarity with CDC opioid prescribing guidelines, perceived competence in chronic opioid management, and comfort with guideline application. Attendees included physicians, advanced practice providers (encompassing nurse practitioners and physician assistants), pharmacists, nurses, researchers and hospital/clinic administrators. Survey responses were compared across self-identified academic versus non-academic practice types, urban versus rural settings, and clinician roles. Results: Across the three years, 72.3% of attendees completed the survey. No significant differences were observed between rural and urban clinicians in guideline familiarity or perceived competence. Academic clinicians were significantly more likely than non-academic clinicians to report the presence of institutional acute opioid prescribing guidelines. Clinicians with higher self-reported competence, particularly those in academic settings, had higher odds of perceiving that applying CDC guidelines and using opioid risk assessment tools require high levels of expertise. Differences by years of experience were not statistically significant. Conclusion: These findings suggest meaningful variation in perceived competence between academic and non-academic clinicians and highlight potential educational opportunities needed to put prescribing guidelines into practice. Continued efforts to disseminate clear, practical guidance and provide targeted education may support safer, more confident opioid prescribing across diverse practice settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.