ArticleClinical case reports2026
Identification of Complex Chromosomal Rearrangement Involving Chromosomes 10, 18, and 19 in a Family Undergoing Prenatal Diagnosis: Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) are rare chromosomal structural abnormalities that are often difficult to be detected. Chromosome conformation-based karyotyping (c-Moka) is an emerging technology designed to analyze the three-dimensional structure of chromosomes, thereby identifying various types of chromosomal structural variations. In our study, conventional karyotyping was performed for a gravida with a high risk of sex chromosome abnormality, as indicated by non-invasive prenatal testing. The analysis suggested a potential chromosome translocation at the terminals of chromosomes 18 and 19. Subsequently, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed at metaphase stage using a 19p13.3 probe. The signal was detected on other chromosome rather than chromosome 18, leading us to hypothesize that the subject might have CCRs that was not identifiable through conventional karyotyping and FISH. To further investigate, we employed c-Moka, which revealed CCRs involving chromosomes 10, 18 and 19. Ultimately, the karyotype of the subject was determined to be 46,XX,t(10;18;19)(q26.3;p11.21;p13.3). This study underscores that, compared to conventional karyotyping, c-Moka has significant advantages in detecting CCRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.