Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382036›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Performing multiple biomarker tests delays initiation of amyloid-targeting treatments.

Anna Hofmann, Madeline Paczynski, Maria R Ponisio, Benjamin Saef, Jessica P Roberts, William J B Powell, Aditi Gupta, Inez Oh, Mackenzie Hofford, Zachary Posey and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anna HofmannDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Madeline PaczynskiDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Maria R PonisioMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Benjamin SaefDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Jessica P RobertsDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
William J B PowellInstitute for Informatics Data Science & Biostatistics Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Aditi GuptaInstitute for Informatics Data Science & Biostatistics Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Inez OhInstitute for Informatics Data Science & Biostatistics Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Mackenzie HoffordInstitute for Informatics Data Science & Biostatistics Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Zachary PoseyDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Melissa AldingerDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Tammie L S BenzingerMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
John C MorrisDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
B Joy SniderDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.
Suzanne E SchindlerDepartment of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the clinical availability of amyloid-targeting treatments (ATTs), accurate and timely biomarker-based diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has become increasingly important. Three AD biomarker modalities are commonly available in clinical practice: amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests, and blood tests.

methodsWe investigated the use and agreement of different biomarker modalities in a memory clinic. Further, we calculated the time until ATT initiation for patients who underwent a single test versus multiple biomarker tests.

resultsThe blood test agreed with amyloid PET in nine of 11 patients and CSF tests in all 14 patients. The median time from first clinic visit to ATT initiation was 4.7 months in 209 patients who underwent a single test and 8.1 months in 12 patients who underwent multiple tests. DISCUSSION: Performing multiple biomarker tests delays initiation of ATT and should be restricted to patients with uncertain amyloid status following the first biomarker test.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseamyloid‐targeting treatmentblood biomarkersclinical implementationdoor‐to‐needle time

Identifiers

PMID42382036
PMCPMC13314552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.