Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42382001›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Comparing Post-Occlusion Surge at Decreasing Intraocular Pressures with Pressure Sensing Handpiece.

Jessie A Montgomery, Coby Soule, Nathan Sherbotie, Ivan A Cardenas, Jenna L Jensen, Jacob A Bell, William R Barlow Jnr, Kolja Klug, Lincoln Wagner, Jeff H Pettey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jessie A MontgomeryDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9723-3892
Coby SouleDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9494-0068
Nathan SherbotieDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5398-4096
Ivan A CardenasDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5821-1407
Jenna L JensenDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5356-8586
Jacob A BellDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-0747-7065
William R Barlow JnrDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1985-3658
Kolja KlugDepartment of Engineering, Center for Medical Innovation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-6815-6385
Lincoln WagnerDepartment of Engineering, Center for Medical Innovation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-9544-8221
Jeff H PetteyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4587-8768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare post-occlusion surge pressure at various intraocular pressures using the Active Sentry handpiece. Methods: This experimental (in vitro chamber) study used the Alcon Centurion platform and Active Sentry handpiece with balanced tips. Quad preset was used with settings: vacuum 500 mmHg, aspiration flow 50 mmHg, and IOPs of 30, 50, and 70 mmHg. A rubber disk was fixed within a sealed chamber fitted with an electric pressure sensor to monitor pressure changes. The phacoemulsification tip was inserted into the water-tight port of the pressure chamber, and the foot pedal was set to position two. The tip was put in contact with the disk to replicate tip occlusion and pulled from the disk to simulate occlusion break. Ten trials were performed at each IOP; pressure changes were recorded continuously. Results: At 70 mmHg IOP, average post-occlusion surge magnitude was 5.76 mmHg ± 0.54; average surge duration was 0.45 s ± 0.10. At 50 mmHg IOP, surge magnitude was 5.76 mmHg ± 1.15; surge duration surge was 0.52 s ± 0.23. At 30 mmHg IOP, surge magnitude was 10.46 mmHg ± 2.86; surge duration was 1.27 s ± 0.51. There was a statistically significant difference between surge magnitude and duration at 30 vs. 50 mmHg IOP (P < 0.05) and at 30 vs. 70 mmHg IOP (P < 0.05). Conclusion: When utilizing the Active Sentry handpiece, an increased surge risk was not observed when operative IOP was decreased from 70 mmHg to 50 mmHg. However, our data suggest that surge risk increases when operative IOP is decreased to 30 mmHg. The Active Sentry handpiece at 50 mmHg IOP would not introduce greater surge risk than at 70 mmHg IOP.

Indexed as

cataractcomplicationsintraocular pressuresurgeultrasound energy

Identifiers

PMID42382001
PMCPMC13317769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.