ArticleAmerican journal of medicine open2026
Utilization of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Routine Patient Care Among Internal Medicine Resident Physicians in the United States.
Article in American journal of medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The integration of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) into internal medicine (IM) residency training and curriculum remains an area for further development and research. Objective: To assess the confidence and barriers to the utilization of POCUS among IM residents in the United States. Methods: This cross-sectional, multi-institutional study involved residents from various IM programs across the United States, who were invited to participate in a voluntary online survey on POCUS confidence and utilization between October 30, 2024, and December 3, 2024. Results: Out of 273 respondents (16.2%), 96.3% were IM residents, and 50.2% were female. 34.4%, 41.0%, and 24.5% were postgraduate year (PGY)-1, PGY-2, and PGY-3, respectively. Residents felt least comfortable with and wanted to learn focused cardiac (46.9%) and extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (45.1%) scans. The top barriers to POCUS utilization were lack of time (55.7%), lack of confidence in interpreting images (42.9%), and limited access to machines (36.3%). Desired interventions included designated elective time for POCUS training (65.6%), ultrasound machines on every floor (55.3%), and formal integration of POCUS training into residency (53.5%). Self-reported confidence also correlated with training level. Conclusions: This is the first national survey to highlight critical gaps in POCUS utilization among IM residents. This study emphasizes the need for targeted POCUS interventions from program leaders, professional societies, and accrediting bodies for IM residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.