Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381988›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Generative AI as interactional infrastructure for meaning-centered care in later life.

Bing Chen, An-Yue Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bing ChenThird Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
An-Yue JinWenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and large language models are rapidly entering mental health research and service delivery, yet their dominant use remains symptom-centric, emphasizing screening, classification, triage, and risk detection. For older adults, mental health is often inseparable from existential concerns: loss of social role, disrupted continuity of self, loneliness, diminished dignity, and questions of legacy. This perspective argues that GenAI should not be conceptualized as an autonomous substitute for clinicians, nurses, social workers, or family caregivers. Instead, it may be better understood as an interactional infrastructure for meaning-centered care in later life. Drawing on meaning-centered psychotherapy, dignity therapy, life review, gerotranscendence theory, care ethics, and implementation science, we propose a Sensing-Narrating-Connecting-Governing framework. In this model, multimodal AI systems help detect existential and relational cues, support life-review conversations, co-construct dignity-preserving narratives, connect older adults with human care networks, and operate under explicit safeguards for privacy, hallucination, dependency, crisis escalation, and cultural adaptation. The proposed framework shifts evaluation from model performance alone toward existential well-being, dignity, continuity of self, therapeutic alliance, equity, and workflow integration. We conclude that GenAI may contribute to public mental health only when deployed as a bounded, human-supervised, culturally responsive layer of relational augmentation rather than as a replacement for human presence.

Indexed as

digital mental healthdignity therapygenerative artificial intelligencelarge language modelslife reviewmeaning-centered careolder adultspublic mental health

Identifiers

PMID42381988
PMCPMC13314595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.