ArticleJTCVS open2026
Isolated aortic valve-sparing aortic root replacement in elective patients with bicuspid aortic valve: A single-center experience.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The David-I procedure is the standard surgical treatment for patients with aortic root aneurysms and preserved aortic valve morphology. Its application in patients with bicuspid aortic valves presents additional challenges. This study compares long-term outcomes of the elective, isolated David-I procedure in patients with bicuspid aortic valves and tricuspid aortic valves. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all elective patients undergoing an isolated David-I procedure between 2004 and 2019. Patients with bicuspid aortic valves or tricuspid aortic valves and isolated aortic root aneurysms with or without aortic regurgitation due to annular dilatation were included, independent of severity. Patients with structural aortic valve disease were scheduled for a Bentall procedure. Surgical indications followed European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Emergency and concomitant procedures were excluded. Follow-up data were obtained from patient questionnaires and echocardiographic reports from referring cardiologists. Results: Thirty-five patients with bicuspid aortic valves and 134 patients with tricuspid aortic valves were included. Patients with bicuspid aortic valves were significantly younger (45.3 ± 11 vs 51.8 ± 12 years, Conclusions: The elective, isolated David-I procedure can be performed with excellent long-term survival in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. However, compared with tricuspid valves, patients with bicuspid aortic valves show a higher rate of redo procedures, indicating the need for careful patient selection and long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.