ArticleJTCVS open2026
Pulmonary artery banding in pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and ventricular remodeling.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Pulmonary artery banding has reemerged as a potential therapeutic strategy for pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy, aiming to promote left ventricular recovery and serve as an alternative or bridge to advanced therapies. However, comprehensive data on its efficacy and safety remain limited. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies enrolling pediatric patients (<18 years) with dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing pulmonary artery banding. Primary outcomes included changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter z-score. Clinical outcomes included native heart survival, all-cause mortality, need for mechanical support, heart transplantation, and pulmonary artery banding failure (death, ventricular assist device, or heart transplantation). Random-effects models were used to pool estimates, and study quality was assessed with Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. Results: Ten studies comprising 175 patients were included. Pulmonary artery banding was associated with a mean increase in left ventricular ejection fraction of +35.3% (95% CI, 32.2-38.6) and a mean reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter z-score of -6.5 (95% CI, -7.6 to -5.5). At latest follow-up, native heart survival was 81.5% (95% CI, 62.1-92.2), all-cause mortality was 10.9% (95% CI, 7.0-16.4), heart transplantation was 6.5% (95% CI, 1.3-26.7), mechanical support was 10.1% (95% CI, 4.0-23.1), and pulmonary artery banding failure was 18.5% (95% CI, 7.8-38.0). Complications included low cardiac output syndrome (45%) and reintervention (up to 43%). Conclusions: In pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy, pulmonary artery banding was associated with significant reverse remodeling and favorable native heart survival. These findings suggest pulmonary artery banding may be a promising strategy to delay or avoid ventricular assist device or heart transplantation in selected children, offering the unique possibility of recovery. Nonetheless, perioperative risks and uncertain long-term durability underscore that pulmonary artery banding should be considered a selective rather than universal intervention, with prospective multicenter studies required to confirm its role within the therapeutic spectrum of pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy. Future research should focus on optimizing patient selection and procedural timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.