Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381949›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2026

Determining the aortic root diameter necessitating replacement during acute type A aortic dissection repair.

Akihiro Yoshitake, Naohiko Oki, Osamu Kinoshita, Takayuki Gyoten, Yuta Kanazawa, Yuto Hori, Hiroaki Aizawa, Taro Kuroda, Yu Kumagai, Toshihisa Asakura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Akihiro YoshitakeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Naohiko OkiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Osamu KinoshitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Takayuki GyotenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Yuta KanazawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Yuto HoriDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroaki AizawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Taro KurodaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Yu KumagaiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Toshihisa AsakuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate long-term outcomes after root preservation and identify the root diameter warranting concomitant replacement during acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair. Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2023, 681 patients with ATAAD underwent surgical repair. After excluding bicuspid aortic valve and connective tissue disorders, 42 patients underwent aortic root replacement or repair and 594 patients underwent ascending or total arch replacement with preservation of the native root. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the aortic root diameter: <45 mm (group A; 535 patients), ≥45 and <50 mm (group B; 41 patients), and ≥50 mm (group C; 18 patients). Results: No significant differences in perioperative outcomes, specifically in-hospital mortality and stroke, were observed among the 3 study groups. The actual survival rates at 5 years and 10 years were 76.6% and 66.4% in group A, 79.2% and 66.0% in group B, and 94.1% and 44.1% in group C (log-rank Conclusions: During surgery for ATAAD, an aortic root with a diameter ≥50 mm should be replaced, given significantly higher 5- and 10-year proximal aortic reoperation rates. In patients with aortic root diameters <50 mm, even if ≥45 mm, the aortic root may be preserved.

Indexed as

acute type A aortic dissectionaortic root diameterroot preservation

Identifiers

PMID42381949
PMCPMC13316331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.