ArticleJTCVS open2026
Interhospital variation in Medicare spending for infections after coronary artery bypass grafting and surgical aortic valve replacement.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Infections following cardiac surgery are common and associated with increased complications and spending. While 1 in 5 beneficiaries experience a postoperative infection within 180 days, rates vary by 40% in absolute terms across hospitals. Efforts to reduce healthcare expenditures would benefit from associating interhospital variability in infection rates with Medicare spending. Methods: A total of 6439 coronary artery bypass grafting and/or surgical aortic valve replacement procedures between 2017 and 2022 across 33 hospitals in Michigan were evaluated using a clinical and administrative dataset. The primary outcome was overall and component inflation-adjusted spending within 180 days after surgery. Spending was compared across risk-adjusted terciles of hospital infection rates and phase of care. Results: The mean age (SD) of the cohort was 71.2 (7.7) years, with 29.1% female patients and 4.8% black patients. The mean adjusted infection rates across the low versus high terciles were 13.2% (2.3%) and 26.7% (6.5%) ( Conclusions: Spending following cardiac surgery varies across hospital risk-adjusted infection rate terciles. Infection prevention interventions could enhance cardiac surgical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.