ArticleJTCVS open2026
Old may still be gold: 45- to 55-year-old donors yield safe early outcomes in adult heart transplantation.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Advanced donor age is a common reason for donor heart offer turndown, especially in donation after circulatory death donors. With advancements in donor heart preservation and perioperative management strategies, the association between donor age and heart transplant outcomes in the current era is unclear. Methods: This was a single-center study of all adult heart transplants from January 2020 to June 2025. The cohort was stratified by donors aged less than 45 years versus donors aged 45 years or more. A subgroup analysis compared donation after brain death donors aged 45 years or more and donation after circulatory death donors aged 45 years or more. Propensity score matching created balanced cohorts. Outcomes of interest included primary graft dysfunction, measures of early graft function and index hospitalization course, and up to 1-year survival. Results: A total of 784 transplants were included in this study, of which 676 (86.2%) were in the standard donor group and 108 (13.8%) were in the old donor group. After 1:1 propensity matching, rates of primary graft dysfunction, cardiac indices and inotropic requirements, ventilation duration, and intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were comparable between the group. One-year mortality was also similar (10.2% donors aged <45 years vs 7.4% donors aged ≥45 years, Conclusions: In the modern era, adult heart transplantation using donors aged 45 years or more yields safe early outcomes. Outcomes between old donation after brain death and donation after circulatory death donors were also comparable, despite the historical hesitancy around old donation after circulatory death donors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.