ArticleJTCVS open2026
Nationwide trends in outcomes and resource utilization in surgically treated acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary malperfusion (CM) is a life-threatening complication of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) that has been associated with poor outcomes. Although overall surgical outcomes for ATAAD have improved over time, contemporary nationwide trends in mortality and the associated use of intensive care unit (ICU)-level resources among patients with CM remain incompletely characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from July 2010 to March 2022. Patients who underwent emergency surgery for ATAAD on the day of admission were included. CM was defined by a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and/or receipt of coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention on the day of admission. Temporal trends in in-hospital mortality were examined, and healthcare resource utilization was compared according to the presence or absence of CM. Results: Among 31,522 patients with surgically treated ATAAD, 1167 (3.7%) were classified as having CM. In-hospital mortality was substantially higher in patients with CM than in those without CM (34.3% vs 9.6%). After multivariable adjustment, CM was associated with increased in-hospital mortality after multivariable adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-2.06). Over the study period, in-hospital mortality declined significantly in patients without CM, whereas no temporal improvement was observed in those with CM. Patients with CM required substantially greater ICU-level resources, including prolonged mechanical ventilation and higher hospitalization costs. Conclusions: In this nationwide cohort of patients with surgically treated ATAAD, CM was associated with persistently poor short-term outcomes and greater ICU resource utilization, without clear improvement over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.