ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Industrial robots and worker health in China: evidence on sectoral heterogeneity and institutional moderation.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Against the backdrop of a rising organic composition of capital driven by industrial automation, this paper examines how industrial robot adoption is associated with worker health in China and how these effects vary across groups, with particular attention to the role of labor-market institutions. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies matched with regional measures of industrial robot penetration, the analysis considers three health-related outcomes: subjective health change, objective health, and mental health. We further test the mechanisms underlying the direct health effects in manufacturing and explore the channels consistent with the cross-sector spillover patterns observed in non-manufacturing by focusing on workers' labor-market position and on the substitutability and complementarity of labor across sectors. The results indicate that, in terms of direct effects, robot adoption is associated with significant declines in all three health measures among workers in the manufacturing sector. For workers in non-manufacturing sectors, the estimates provide suggestive evidence of cross-sector spillovers, with effects differing across health dimensions. Moreover, the health consequences of robot adoption exhibit substantial heterogeneity across worker groups, suggesting uneven health effects among workers. Overall, the findings suggest that, as capital deepening reshapes labor processes, strengthening health-risk protection and improving access to medical insurance may help mitigate adverse health consequences, especially for more vulnerable workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.