Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381907›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

The psychological process and support needs of HIV-positive individuals who disclose their status to sexual partners: a qualitative study.

Chen Pan, Caifeng Luo, Aixian Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chen PanSchool of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Caifeng LuoSchool of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Aixian LiThe Kunshan Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the psychological journey and core needs of People living with HIV (PLWH) intending to disclose their status to sexual partners, providing a theoretical basis for constructing a disclosure support system. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 15 People living with HIV at a hospital in Changzhou, China. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interview data. Results: Five themes were identified regarding disclosure to sexual partners: (1) disclosure motivation and internal drivers; (2) risk perception during the disclosure process; (3) preparation and perceived capacity for disclosure; (4) safety protection strategies; and (5) external and social support needs. These themes reveal a multidimensional and interwoven risk perception system in disclosure decision-making, including fears of discrimination, relationship breakdown, social stigma, and threats to economic security. They further systematically outline the proactive and strategic safety behaviors individuals employ to mitigate such risks, including scenario selection, information control, and exit planning. Conclusion: The findings highlight that the decisions of People living with HIV to disclose their status to sexual partners involve a dynamic interplay of emotional, ethical, and stigma-related pressures. Clinical care should establish dedicated disclosure counseling roles, provide role-play-based communication skills training, and build multidisciplinary support networks.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual PartnersSocial SupportTruth DisclosureAdultChinaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial Stigmadisclosure preferenceHIVqualitative researchsexual partner disclosurethematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID42381907
PMCPMC13315003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.