ReviewFrontiers in drug safety and regulation2026
Use of public health databases for the early identification of Autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review protocol.
Review in Frontiers in drug safety and regulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) remains a significant challenge for health services worldwide. Delayed diagnosis can lead to negative outcomes for individuals and increased costs for healthcare systems. Utilizing public health databases presents a strategy for identifying clinical characteristics that facilitate the early detection of ASD. This study aims to systematically map the existing evidence on the use of public health databases for the early identification of children and adults with ASD, irrespective of geographic location. Methods and Analysis: This scoping review will follow the methodological guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute. A comprehensive search strategy, validated by a professional librarian, will be conducted across multiple databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and LILACS (via the Virtual Health Library). Gray literature will be reviewed using ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. The review will include only primary studies that utilize public health databases for the early detection of ASD. No restrictions on language or geographic location will be applied. Screening and data extraction will be independently conducted by two trained reviewers, followed by a thematic categorization of studies based on similarities. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval is not required since this review will exclusively utilize data from published scientific articles. Preliminary findings and final results will be disseminated through presentations at relevant conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals. Registration Number: Open Science Framework. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RMVWE (https://osf.io/rmvwe/).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.