ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026
Deep learning-based identification of causative genes in lissencephaly using 3D-MRI volumetric datasets.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This paper reports a genetic identification task using 3D convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) models applied to a proprietary 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dataset of patients with lissencephaly. Lissencephaly is a neuronal migration disorder caused by genetic mutations or deletions in which specific causative genes result in distinct morphological alterations in brain structure. Objective: The objective of this study was to identify causative genes through image classification by analysing three-dimensional structural features of brain MRI using deep learning. Methods: In our experiments, we extended representative CNN architectures to handle three-dimensional inputs and performed three-class classification targeting the primary causative genes, Results: Our results demonstrated that the 3D-ResNet18 model achieved a mean classification accuracy of over 78%. Furthermore, to enhance the precision for primary genes, we introduced a decision-making process based on prediction probability thresholds. Conclusions: This approach yielded an average precision improvement of 4.67% for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.