ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026
Ambiguity tolerance and resting-state functional connectivity: A preregistered conceptual replication in a Japanese sample.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neural substrates of ambiguity and beauty in haiku poetry: an fMRI study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine how three dimensions of the Multidimensional Attitude toward Ambiguity Scale (MAAS)-Discomfort with Ambiguity, Absolutism, and Need for Complexity-relate to resting-state functional connectivity, conceptually replicating and extending the work of Liu et al. (2023) in a Japanese sample. Liu et al. (2023) reported that higher ambiguity tolerance was associated with stronger connectivity in integration and control networks, whereas lower ambiguity tolerance was associated with stronger connectivity in threat- and error-monitoring circuits. Of the three MAAS dimensions, Need for Complexity was the one most closely aligned with their measure. Methods: Thirty-nine participants underwent resting-state MRI and completed the MAAS. Region-of-interest (ROI)-to-ROI analyses were used to test the associations between each MAAS dimension and its hypothesized connectivity pair, controlling for age, sex, and head motion. Results: No MAAS dimension was significantly associated with its corresponding connectivity pair. Effect sizes were negligible, although the Need for Complexity showed a small zero-order correlation with inferior parietal lobule-middle cingulate cortex connectivity. Conclusions: These findings contrast with earlier reports using unidimensional measures, suggesting that previously observed neural correlates may not map directly onto specific MAAS dimensions. Larger, well-powered, cross-cultural studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.