Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381862›Full record

ReviewHumanities & social sciences communications2026

A scoping review of the use of visual methods in supporting women with substance use histories.

Raginie Duara, Netalie Shloim, Anna Madill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Humanities & social sciences communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raginie DuaraUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Netalie ShloimUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Anna MadillUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problematic use of substances is a growing global issue, however only 1 in 18 women with this issue seek treatment and interventions have been critiqued for overlooking gender-specific needs. Given the rich history of visual methods in research and therapy, our aim is to conduct a scoping review exploring how visual methods are used in research involving cisgender women with a substance use history, with a particular focus on their potential to support recovery. Visual methods, in this review, refers to approaches that use images or other visual creations, such as digital storytelling, photovoice, drawing, collage, and visual elicitation techniques. These methods offer non-verbal modes of expression that can support narrative agency and help tackle stigma, trauma, and relational complexities often experienced by women in recovery. Five databases, Medline, PsychINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were searched to identify peer-reviewed empirical papers that address women's recovery from substance use and employed visual methods where women participated in the visual creations. Of 5776 initial records, 27 articles were identified. Using content and thematic analysis, we outline how visual methods are used in these articles and what we can learn about the potential of visual methods in supporting women's recovery. Articles were divided into two groups. The first have direct relevance to recovery and consist of three themes capturing process of change: Gaining temporal context, Transformation beyond reflection, and Power of shared stories. The second have indirect relevance to recovery and consist of two themes identifying pathways to recovery: Informing services and Developing community support. In conclusions, visual methods have immense potential in supporting women's recovery through making their experiences tangible and as a tool for knowledge translation bridging the gap between research, practice and policy to inform gender-responsive support systems.

Indexed as

Health humanitiesPsychology

Identifiers

PMID42381862
PMCPMC13314533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.