ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2026
A workflow to reduce red blood cell autofluorescence for imaging IL-4/IL-4R interactions in the inflamed lung.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Autofluorescence is a common challenge in fluorescence microscopy of inflamed tissue, particularly where red blood cell (RBC) autofluorescence can mimic true fluorescence signals. This complicates image interpretation, reduces counting accuracy, and undermines reproducibility. Reliable methods are needed to distinguish true signals from autofluorescence, while preserving tissue architecture. In this study, we address this challenge by developing an optimized workflow that integrates antigen retrieval, selective fluorophore choice, and spectral separation. Summary: Autofluorescence hinders the detection of protein interactions in inflamed tissues by generating signals indistinguishable from true positives, leading to misinterpretation and errors. This study aims to establish and validate a reproducible workflow that enables discriminating between RBC autofluorescence and true proximity ligation assay (PLA) signals in paraffin-embedded inflamed lung tissue. Our approach combines antigen retrieval, selective fluorophore excitation, spectral unmixing, and post-processing to minimize autofluorescence while maintaining tissue integrity. We demonstrate the workflow's efficacy using the PLA, a fluorescence-based technique in which antibody-coupled DNA probes generate a detectable signal only when two proteins are located within nanometer-scale proximity. Using this approach, we detected PLA signals suggesting spatial proximity between interleukin-4 (IL-4) and its receptor (IL-4R) on RBCs within inflamed lung tissue, a context in which RBC autofluorescence is particularly problematic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.