ReviewJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Antibiotics in Hand Surgery: Guidelines and Review.
Review in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical site infection (SSI) remains an important concern in hand surgery, despite low baseline infection rates, especially in clean, elective soft tissue procedures. This manuscript synthesizes current evidence and guidelines on preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in hand surgery, focusing on procedure type, patient-specific risk factors, and implications for antimicrobial stewardship. Contemporary guidelines advise against routine prophylaxis in clean orthopedic soft tissue procedures, yet practice patterns vary. Evidence from retrospective studies and prospective trials consistently shows no significant reduction in SSI rates with prophylactic antibiotics in common soft tissue hand procedures, including carpal tunnel and trigger finger release, even when performed in procedure room settings. In implant-related hand surgery, theoretical infection risk is elevated because of potential biofilm formation. However, emerging evidence similarly indicates no significant difference in infection rates with or without prophylaxis in clean cases. Patient-related factors such as diabetes, immunosuppression, smoking, obesity, and prolonged operative duration are associated with increased SSI risk, but the extent to which prophylactic antibiotics mitigate this risk remains unclear. Notably, even in higher-risk populations, data supporting routine antibiotic use are inconsistent. Cefazolin is the preferred prophylactic agent because of its efficacy, safety profile, and low cross reactivity in patients with reported penicillin allergy. Substitution with alternative agents such as clindamycin or vancomycin is associated with higher complication and infection rates. Adverse events related to antibiotic use, including allergic reactions,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.