Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381843›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026

The young researcher's guide to moderator variables.

Chittaranjan Andrade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chittaranjan AndradeDepartment of Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neurotoxicology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences. Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most researchers are familiar with confounding variables, and the need to define and measure these variables at the time of conducting a study. Researchers also need to be familiar with moderator variables. A moderator variable is one that influences the relationship between a predictor variable and an outcome. Expressed otherwise, if the strength (or direction) of the relationship between a predictor variable and an outcome is different at different levels of a third variable, that third variable is a moderator variable. This article uses a simple example from a published study to explain how age can be a moderator variable. Other examples of moderator variables are presented. Moderator variables should be postulated based on existing evidence and the researcher's judgement, and are studied by including a (Predictor Variable) x (Moderator Variable) interaction term in regression. The use and interpretation of this interaction is explained. Inclusion of interaction terms increases the sample size (or event count, for categorical variables) required to avoid overfitting in regression. The study of moderator variables is necessary for better theoretical understanding of a field, for treatment optimization, and to identify subgroups that require attention in research and practice.

Indexed as

Confounding variabledependent variableinteraction effectmoderator variableregressionrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID42381843
PMCPMC13318327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.