ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026
From gaps to action: Possible strategies to address challenges in the assessment of specific learning disabilities and borderline intellectual functioning under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In India, the rights of persons with disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016, aims to ensure dignity, equality, and autonomy for persons with disabilities, and sets out guidelines for the assessment and certification of various disabilities. Among the disabilities covered under the Act, several critical gaps have been consistently noted in the assessment and certification of specific learning disabilities (SLD) and intellectual impairment-related conditions. These include the rigid application of intelligence quotient (IQ) criterion in SLD assessment, as well as the difficulties in evaluating adults who may have SLD but were never formally diagnosed during childhood. In addition, persons with borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) are often overlooked, as this condition is not recognized as a benchmark disability. Against this backdrop, the present paper proposes changes needed in the RPwD Act Guidelines for assessing and certifying these conditions. To provide context, it first reviews how current diagnostic systems conceptualize SLD and BIF, and traces the major shifts in these conceptualizations over time that inform current understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.