ArticleKidney international reports2026
Scoping Review of Global Kidney Genetics Clinic Models and Outcomes.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Genomic testing is reshaping nephrology practice, yet the implementation and outcomes of kidney genetics services remain poorly characterized. Methods: We conducted a 2-part scoping study comprising the following: (i) a literature review (Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews compliant; Open Science Framework registration doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/N32VA) of English-language publications (2000-2025) describing kidney genetics services and outcomes, and (ii) an international stakeholder consultation of clinic leads to capture real-world implementation experiences. Results: Sixty studies were included, predominantly from North America ( Conclusion: Kidney genetics care is expanding but remains unevenly implemented. Nephrologist-led models can be effective with support. Patient selection may influence diagnostic yield more than testing modality. Standardized outcome reporting and theory-driven implementation evaluation are essential for equitable and sustainable genomic services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.