ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602026
The efficacy and safety of hyoscyamine, dicyclomine, and desipramine in the treatment of irritable pouch syndrome-a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) frequently experience high bowel frequency and abdominal pain that are disproportionate to endoscopic inflammation, a condition often termed irritable pouch syndrome. Although antispasmodic agents and neuromodulators are widely used in irritable bowel syndrome, real-world data supporting their effectiveness and durability in patients with pouches remain limited. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of IPAA patients followed at a pouch clinic between 2014 and 2025. Patients treated with hyoscyamine extended release (ER), dicyclomine, or desipramine for high bowel frequency or abdominal pain were included. Patients could receive multiple therapies sequentially over time. Clinical response was determined by physician-documented symptom improvement. Treatment persistence was assessed using electronic medical record prescription data. Results: Among 219 eligible patients, 329 treatment courses were analyzed: 143 hyoscyamine ER, 80 dicyclomine, and 106 desipramine. In patients with high bowel frequency, 235 treatment courses resulted in clinical improvement in 68.5% of patients receiving hyoscyamine ER, 65.0% of those receiving dicyclomine, and 63.5% of those receiving desipramine. For abdominal pain (94 treatment courses), improvement for hyoscyamine ER, dicyclomine, and desipramine was observed in 61.5%, 68.3%, and 76.2% of courses, respectively. Approximately 60% of treatment courses persisted beyond one year. Long-term persistence (≥3 years) was highest with dicyclomine (48.7%), followed by desipramine (38.7%) and hyoscyamine ER (37.8%). Adverse events were infrequent and consistent with known safety profiles. Conclusions: Antispasmodic agents and low-dose neuromodulators are associated with meaningful symptom improvement in patients with irritable pouch syndrome, supporting their role as adjunctive therapies for pouch-related functional symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.