ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026
Antifungal Susceptibility of Rare Yeasts Causing Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in the Acidic Vaginal Environment.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the in vitro potency of 13 antifungals against emerging rare yeast species causing vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) under the influence of acidic pH. Methods: Antifungal susceptibility was determined according to CLSI M27/M44-ed3 with minor modifications. In total, 42 isolates of rare yeast were isolated from the vaginal samples based on molecular identification, including Results: The antifungal agents most affected by a lower pH were terconazole (3 two-fold dilutions higher, MIC >0.5-8 mg/L) for all yeast isolates, followed by amphotericin B (2 two-fold dilutions higher, MIC >2 mg/L) for 93% of isolates, nystatin (2 two-fold dilutions higher, MIC >4-8 mg/L) for 95% of isolates, and micafungin (2 two-fold dilutions higher, MIC >0.125-1 mg/L) for 50% of isolates, compared with those at pH 7.0, indicating a high percentage of low activity against the yeast species. Fluconazole, voriconazole, miconazole, and clotrimazole were the least affected, while anidulafungin, caspofungin, and 5-flucytosine were not affected significantly by pH, showing activity against most rare yeast species at both pH levels. Conclusion: The noted shift toward rare yeasts could present a challenge to the clinical treatment of VVC. Considering the influence of acidic pH, our results reveal apparently drug-specific and genus-specific trends in antifungal susceptibility. The variability of rare yeasts with regard to antifungal susceptibility at acidic pH warrants further research on this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.