ArticleJDS communications2026
Effects of an electrolyte, energy, and osmolyte compound and heat stress on productivity in early-lactation Holstein cows.
Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heat stress affects milk production and intake of dairy cattle. Strategies to mitigate the effects of heat stress suggest dietary supplements including electrolyte, energy, and osmolyte compounds (such as Bovine BlueLite, TechMix, Stewart, MN, which is a blend of these compounds), but direct and long-term evaluation of this supplement in lactating cows is needed. We hypothesized that the supplement would improve productivity of dairy cows (∼52 DIM) under heat stress. Cows (n = 52) were enrolled into a 4-wk 2 × 2 factorial arrangement as follows: (1) heat stress control (HT-CON, n = 13), (2) heat stress plus supplement (HT-SUP, n = 13), (3) cooling control (CL-CON, n = 13), and (4) cooling plus supplement (CL-SUP, n = 13). Cows were housed in a freestall barn. Supplement treatment was top-dressed on TMR (56.5 g/cow in the morning and 56.5 g/cow in the afternoon feeding). Evaporative cooling was provided to cows in the cooling groups, whereas heat-stressed cows only had shade. Milk yield, DMI, rectal temperature (RT), and respiration rate (RR) of individual cows were recorded during the study. Furthermore, milk contents of fat, protein, and lactose were measured weekly. Heat stress increased RR and RT relative to the cooling groups. Heat stress reduced DMI (HT = 20.3, CL = 24.5 ± 0.4 kg/d; ± SE), and supplementation reversed some of the effects in heat-stressed cows (HT-SUP = 20.9, HT-CON = 19.6 ± 0.5 kg/d) but did not affect cooled cows. The ECM yield was also decreased by heat stress (HT = 38.1, CL = 42.6 ± 0.8 kg/d), and supplementation partially reversed that effect in HT-SUP relative to HT-CON (HT-SUP = 39.6, HT-CON = 36.5 ± 1.1 kg/d). No main effects were observed for milk components, cortisol, or heat shock protein plasma concentration. Results suggest that supplementation partially mitigated the effects of heat stress on DMI and ECM in lactating dairy cows.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.