Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381678›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2026

Methods for estimating milk production of dairy cows with full cow-calf contact.

C L van Zyl, A T M van Knegsel, S Agenäs, E A M Bokkers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C L van ZylAdaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
A T M van KnegselAdaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
S AgenäsDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
E A M BokkersAnimal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dairy cows with full cow-calf contact can nurse their calves and perform maternal behaviors without hindrance. Owing to the unrestricted suckling, the total milk production of the suckled cows (i.e., machine milk yield [MMY] and milk consumed by the calf) is unknown, albeit required for performance testing and sustainability analyses of prolonged cow-calf contact. This study aimed to estimate the daily milk production of dairy cows with full cow-calf contact spanning the whole day using 2 methods. First, individual milk production was estimated using the daily energy intake during the preweaning suckling period and the ratio of MMY to the previous day's energy intake, calculated for the 8-wk postsuckling period. Second, individual milk production was estimated using the daily MMY during the suckling period and adding the estimated calf milk consumption based on their body weight, growth, and energy intake from concentrates. This was done for conventionally managed cows with no contact with their calves beyond 13.5 h after birth (NC; n = 20) and for cows with full contact with their calves until gradual weaning at 13.0 ± 1.1 wk of age (FC; n = 18). Using the first method based on energy intake of the cow, milk production of NC cows was estimated at 33.33 ± 1.40 kg/d and their milk yield to the automatic milking unit averaged 37.73 ± 1.40 kg/d during the first 12 wk of lactation. This discrepancy might be because cows likely experienced a negative energy balance during the preweaning period, which was not accounted for in the estimation. For FC cows, average milk production was estimated at 35.30 ± 1.40 kg/d and their milk yield to the milking unit averaged 24.74 ± 1.60 kg/d during the suckling period of the first 12 wk of lactation. Using the second method based on the estimated milk consumption of FC calves (14.91 ± 2.9 kg/d; mean ± SD), milk production of FC cows during the suckling period was estimated at 37.94 ± 1.80 kg/d. In conclusion, both methods evaluated could estimate milk production of suckled FC cows. In the first method, milk production was underestimated when using ME intake and milk yield during the nonsuckling period, possibly due to not accounting for body reserve mobilization. In the second method, milk production of suckled cows estimated using calf growth aligned with the recorded MMY of nonsuckled cows. The ∼15 kg/d estimated milk consumption of FC calves during the first 13 wk of life corresponded to the recorded milk yield difference between FC and NC cows. Methods evaluated in this study can be applied for performance testing and sustainability analyses of cow-calf contact systems.

Identifiers

PMID42381678
PMCPMC13316392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.