ArticleJDS communications2026
Detection of airborne bovine coronavirus RNA in pen environments and exhaled breath of calves.
Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a significant economic and welfare concern in the cattle industry. Commingling (mixing) events create environments conducive to the spread of bovine coronavirus (BCV), a common calf BRD pathogen. Although BCV is thought to spread primarily through direct contact, the role of airborne transmission remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the potential for airborne and fomite transmission of BCV among weaned (8-10 wk old) Angus × Holstein calves during a controlled commingling event. Eighty animals across 2 cohorts, raised under commercial farming conditions at 7 source farms, were enrolled in the study. Air, exhaled breath, and surface swabs were collected from solid-sided pens housing BCV-shedding calves and an adjacent, unoccupied separator pen. Exhaled breath was sampled using a novel device (IMADGENN) designed to capture particles at defined distances from the source. IMADGENN is a purpose-built chamber equipped with HEPA-filtered air supply and extraction systems to ensure low background aerosol levels and efficient sample collection. A low amount of BCV RNA was detected in the air of both occupied and unoccupied pens (at least 2.5 m away from the closest shedding animal), and surfaces in unoccupied pens were also found to be contaminated. Bovine coronavirus was also detected in exhaled breath of shedding calves, at a distance of at least 1.2 m from the sampled animal. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that BCV particles are shed into the environment via exhaled breath, resulting in contamination of air and surfaces with viral RNA. These findings suggest that airborne dispersal and fomites may be a potential transmission route for virions and could contribute to BCV spread during commingling events.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.