Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381662›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Community-based cultural heritage preservation through the

Emily Costan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emily CostanCollege of Education, Arts and Sciences, Cebu Technological University Danao Campus, Danao, Cebu, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preservation of cultural heritage is a universal concern that has to reach the local community to protect its history, identity, and pride. But despite various national and local heritage initiatives in the Philippines, limited research has examined how micro-level units function, such as the Purok system. This study employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design to examine the cultural heritage preservation of the Municipality of Liloan, Cebu. A survey of 264 members from six puroks was analyzed using linear regression models, and a focus group discussion with 20 purposively selected participants was conducted. The quantitative results show that awareness plays a more critical role than participation in influencing local government initiatives, indicating a positive relationship with the independent variables. This implies that higher awareness and greater participation are generally associated with more substantial government-led preservation efforts. Further, the participation in cultural activities has a positive, statistically significant effect on community initiatives; however, awareness of cultural heritage preservation shows a negative relationship, suggesting that awareness alone may not translate into active community preservation initiatives. The qualitative analysis emphasizes themes of lived engagement, stewardship, and motivational pathways, demonstrating that preservation is reinforced through shared responsibilities, social interaction, collective identity, continuity, and community meaning rather than solely through knowledge. The findings also reveal that younger residents show lower levels of engagement, yet their digital skills offer opportunities for innovative documentation and promotion of heritage assets. These results indicate the potential of the Purok system as a community-based framework for strengthening participatory and sustainable cultural heritage preservation efforts.

Indexed as

community participationcultural heritage preservationmixed-methods designPurok systemsustainable development

Identifiers

PMID42381662
PMCPMC13314497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.