ArticleBiometrics2026
Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.
Article in Biometrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Longitudinal binary or count functional data are common in neuroscience, but are often too large to analyze with existing functional regression methods. We propose one-step penalized generalized estimating equations that support generalized functional outcomes (e.g., count, binary, proportion, continuous-valued) and is fast even when datasets have a large number of clusters and large cluster sizes. The method applies to functional and scalar covariates and the one-step estimation framework enables efficient smoothing parameter selection and joint confidence interval construction. Importantly, this semi-parametric approach yields coefficient confidence intervals that are provably valid asymptotically even under working correlation misspecification. By developing a general theory for adaptive one-step M-estimation, we prove that the coefficient estimates are asymptotically normal and as efficient as the fully-iterated estimator; we verify these theoretical properties in simulations. We illustrate the benefits of our approach for analyzing large-scale neural recordings by applying it to a recent calcium imaging dataset published in Nature. We show that our method reveals important timing effects obscured in non-functional analyses. In doing so, we also demonstrate scaling to common neuroscience dataset sizes: the one-step estimator fits to a dataset with 150,000 (binary) functional outcomes, each observed at 120 functional domain points, in only $\sim 6.5$ minutes on a laptop without parallelization. We release our methods in the $\tt {R}$ package $\tt {fastFGEE}$, which supports a wide range of link functions and working covariances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.