Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381506›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026

Case-malformed signal detection and prioritisation using EUROmediCAT data for pharmacovigilance in pregnancy.

Hannah Johnson, Helen Dolk, Maria Loane, Christine Damase-Michel, Joanne Given, Hedvig Nordeng, Jorieke E H Bergman, Iain Carey, Elly Den Hond, Ester Garne and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Hannah JohnsonCity St George's (School of Health & Medical Sciences), London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3055-769X
Helen DolkSchool of Medicine, Ulster University, Londonderry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6639-5904
Maria LoaneInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-3637
Christine Damase-MichelFaculté de Médecine, CERPOP UMR INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Université Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5018-0108
Joanne GivenInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4921-1944
Hedvig NordengPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6361-2918
Jorieke E H BergmanEUROCAT Northern Netherlands, Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3929-3619
Iain CareyCity St George's (School of Health & Medical Sciences), London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1099-8460
Elly Den HondProvincial Institute of Hygiene (PIH), Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3909-6877
Ester GarneDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0430-2594
Florence RougetBrittany Registry of Congenital Anomalies, CHU Rennes, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5514-0893
Lea BruneauThe Reunion Registry of Congenital Malformations (REMACOR), Department of Public Health and Research Support, University Hospital of La Réunion, Saint Pierre, Reunion Island, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4310-215X
Isabelle MonierCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Life Course Epidemiology Research Team, Inserm, INRAE, Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Paris, France.
Anke RissmannMalformation Monitoring Centre Saxony-Anhalt, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9437-2790
Mary O'MahonyDepartment of Public Health, St Finbarr's Hospital, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0574-7579
Miriam GattMalta Congenital Anomalies Registry, Directorate for Health Information and Research, Pietà, Malta.
Renée LutkeEUROCAT Northern Netherlands, Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Joanna SichitiuUltrasound and Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Women-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4453-1167
Elisa BallardiniNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, IMER Registry (Emilia Romagna Registry of Birth Defects), Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8813-1835
Alessio CoiUnit of Epidemiology of Rare Diseases and Congenital Anomalies, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9816-3144
Clara Cavero CarbonellRare Disease Research Unit, Foundation for Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencian Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4858-6456
David TuckerResearch, Data & Digital Directorate, Public Health Wales, Swansea, UK.
Joan MorrisCity St George's (School of Health & Medical Sciences), London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-612X

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N013638/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimMany women take medications during pregnancy. However, the risk to the fetus from most medications is uncertain. Congenital anomalies are one of the leading causes of infant death and contribute to long-term disability. Signal detection methods can be used to systematically identify possible medication-anomaly associations that require further investigation.

methodsData on first trimester medication exposures in pregnancies with a congenital anomaly reported to 14 EUROmediCAT registries with a birth year of 2005-2018 were analysed. Case-malformed disproportionality analysis identified medication-anomaly signals using a disproportionality signal detection method. Identified signals were then compared to previous EUROmediCAT signal detection studies and ranked based on a proxy for the severity of impact at a population level using the number of estimated excess congenital anomaly cases within the exposed population and the average additional time in hospital over the first year of life. Generalized linear mixed models were used to assess confounding by birth year and registry within the top 20 ranked signals.

results1611 medication-outcome pairs with at least three observations were analysed, and 153 signals for 63 different medications were identified. Of the top 20 ranked signals, 10 (involving nine medications) were prioritized for further independent investigation.

conclusionThe signals identified here are hypothesis forming only. Independent studies that adequately account for confounding are subsequently needed to evaluate if the identified signals are causal. Further investigation of signals with low population impact, but high potential individual risk is also recommended.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilanceEuropeFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstRegistriescongenital anomalydisproportionality analysisEUROmediCATpregnancysignal detection

Identifiers

PMID42381506
PMCPMC13619031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.