ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Effects of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL)-directed therapy on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) type Richter transformation compared to de novo DLBCL in a nationwide cohort.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) type Richter transformation (DLBCL-RT) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has a worse prognosis compared to de novo DLBCL (dnDLBCL). We investigated outcomes of patients with DLBCL-RT with or without previous CLL-directed therapy compared to dnDLBCL between 2002 and 2022. We included 6525 patients with dnDLBCL and 383 patients with DLBCL-RT, of whom 260 had Richter transformed treatment-naïve CLL (RT:TN-CLL) and 123 had Richter transformed treatment exposed CLL (RT:TE-CLL). Median time to next treatment or death (TTNTd) was 4.83 years, 1.43 years and 0.46 years for patients with dnDLBCL, RT:TN-CLL and RT:TE-CLL respectively. Median overall survival (OS) following first-line treatment was 9.42, 5.22 and 0.72 years for dnDLBCL, RT:TN-CLL and RT:TE-CLL respectively (p < 0.001). In a high-validity subcohort, OS did not differ significantly between RT:TN-CLL and dnDLBCL (median OS 9.85 years [CI: 9.16-10.70] for dnDLBCL, 6.07 years [CI: 4.23-not estimable] for RT:TN-CLL and 1.15 years [CI: 0.76-3.66] for RT:TE-CLL). In conclusion, patients with RT:TE-CLL had inferior TTNTd and OS compared to RT:TN-CLL and dnDLBCL. RT:TN-CLL demonstrated inferior TTNTd compared to dnDLBCL, but OS approached that of dnDLBCL. This indicates that for patients with RT:TN-CLL, chemoimmunotherapy may still be an effective modality, while patients with RT:TE-CLL need novel treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.