ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2026
Sex Differences in Cancer Stage at Diagnosis of Nonreproductive Solid Organ Tumors in the United States, 2015 to 2022.
Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMen are more likely to die from cancer than women, which may partly be explained by differences in diagnosis stage. This pan-cancer analysis examined sex differences in cancer stage at diagnosis for nonreproductive solid organ tumors across 30 cancer sites.
methodsWe used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 21 database (2015-2022, excluding 2020). We conducted multiple polytomous logistic regression to assess the association between sex and stage of disease (localized vs. regional and localized vs. distant) for each site, adjusted for age and diagnosis year. We further conducted stratified analyses based on race and ethnicity and county-level median household income.
resultsOf the 30 sites examined, males had greater odds of being diagnosed at regional and/or distant stages compared with the localized stage for 20 sites, while having lower odds of being diagnosed at the later stages for four sites, compared with females. When examining distant stage, the site with the largest adjusted odds ratios (aOR; i.e., male predominance) was the tongue [aOR = 2.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.16-2.53]; the smallest aOR (i.e., female predominance) was for the bladder (aOR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.66-0.72).
conclusionsFor most sites we examined, males were significantly more likely to be diagnosed at regional or distant staging than localized staging when compared with females. IMPACT: Further investigation is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms driving sex-based differences in stage at diagnosis and to identify effective, targeted intervention strategies aimed at reducing diagnostic disparities, particularly among males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.