ReviewAge and ageing2026
New horizons in advance care planning: narratives, identity and cultural humility.
Review in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advance care planning (ACP) is considered important for patient-centred care in serious illness, yet evidence it benefits patients is inconsistent. This reflects a lack of clarity over how ACP interventions are supposed to achieve their intended goals and what these goals should be, leading to variation in implementation. This article seeks to address this knowledge gap by focusing on the role of narratives. Although ACP draws on patients' illness narratives (their personal stories of illness, including hopes and fears), the role of these narratives is often unacknowledged. We systematically reviewed the evidence on narratives and ACP and synthesised the findings with broader multidisciplinary literature. Attending to patient narratives can be a route to achieving many goals of ACP (including preserving patient autonomy, strengthening relationships and preparing for end-of-life) and can help patients to maintain their identity, which is important for well-being but is disrupted by illness and frailty. The values underpinning ACP are culturally-specific, however, with less relevance for some patients: better appreciation of this is a step towards cultural humility and more equitable care. The role of clinicians in contributing to patient life narratives through ACP is controversial. Some argue that clinicians should shape their patient's narrative, helping them to make meaning at the end-of-life, while others have problematised expectations that patients tell, and clinicians facilitate, 'good death' stories. Synthesising existing knowledge provides clinicians with insights on how to approach end-of-life conversations through framing discussions around patient narratives and lays the foundations for future research exploring narrative approaches to ACP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.