ReviewJapanese journal of clinical oncology2026
De-escalation of breast surgery for early stage breast cancer.
Review in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer treatment is rapidly evolving toward precision-based de-escalation strategies for oncological safety and minimizing treatment-related morbidity. In early stage disease, minimally invasive approaches, such as non-surgical ablation techniques, including cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation, potentially constitute alternatives to conventional surgery for carefully selected low-risk tumors. Active surveillance trials challenge the necessity of immediate surgery for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ, reflecting a paradigm shift toward risk-adapted management. In the neoadjuvant setting, achieving radiologic and pathologic complete responses, particularly in HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes, is being investigated to determine the feasibility of omitting breast surgery under strict imaging and biopsy-guided protocols. Circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease assays offer a promising tool for refining risk stratification and potentially guiding the extent of surgery and adjuvant therapy. These strategies represent a transformative movement toward biologically tailored, response-adapted, less invasive treatments for early breast cancer to optimize quality of life without compromising long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.