ArticleJapanese journal of clinical oncology2026
Immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity following CAR-T cell therapies: insights from a large national database.
Article in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity is a recognized but incompletely characterized complication of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, defined by prolonged, severe, or recurrent cytopenias following CAR-T infusion, not explained by conditioning chemotherapy or disease progression alone. Despite formal consensus grading criteria from the European Hematology Association and European Bone Marrow Transplantation group, the post-marketing pharmacovigilance profile of ICAHT across all approved CAR-T agents has not been systematically described. The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was queried through March 2026 using OpenVigil 2.1 for all seven currently FDA-approved CAR-T products. Disproportionality was assessed using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals, Proportional Reporting Ratio with chi-squared statistic, and Bayesian Reporting Rate Ratio. An adverse drug reaction classification was applied when all three signal detection thresholds were simultaneously met. ICAHT cases were identified in five of seven agents. Axicabtagene ciloleucel had the highest case count (n = 18) and most precisely estimated ROR (1365.54; 95% CI: 778.83-2394.24). All five agents with ICAHT reports met pre-specified signal detection criteria across all three analytical methods, with lower ROR confidence bounds substantially exceeding 1.00 in every case. No ICAHT reports were identified for obecabtagene autoleucel or tisagenlecleucel, with the former having minimal post-marketing data and the latter potentially reflecting genuine mechanistic differences related to its 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. These findings demonstrate that ICAHT generates exceptionally strong and concordant pharmacovigilance signals across multiple CAR-T products, supporting heightened post-infusion hematologic monitoring with a low threshold for investigating unexplained cytopenias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.