ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Advances in Remote Monitoring Technology Applications in Anesthesia: A Narrative Review.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The swift progress of digital and sensor technologies is hastening the incorporation of remote monitoring into anesthesiology. While several reviews have explored telemedicine and artificial intelligence in anesthesia, most existing summaries either focus on conceptual outlook or lack systematic comparison of technical platforms and original clinical validation data. The present review provides a comprehensive, clinically oriented synthesis of remote monitoring in anesthesia, with clear focuses on technical principles, perioperative applications, platform comparisons, and evidence-based clinical outcomes. We critically assess clinical advantages and implementation hurdles, covering the full perioperative pathway - preoperative evaluation, intraoperative observation, and postoperative recovery. A head-to-head comparison of fifth generation of cellular network technology (5G), the Internet of Things (IoT), and cloud computing platforms is presented to clarify their infrastructure demands and suitability for real-world clinical scenarios. Notably, this review summarizes available clinical evidence, including evidence from the Trial of Remote Continuous versus Intermittent National Early Warning Score Monitoring after major surgery (TRaCINg) - a feasibility randomized controlled trial whose exploratory findings suggest that continuous remote monitoring may reduce unplanned intensive care unit admissions, shorten hospital stays, and facilitate earlier detection of postoperative complications. We further propose innovative solutions including multimodal data fusion and federated learning-driven predictive analytics to overcome current limitations in data interoperability, security, and clinical effectiveness. Accordingly, this paper synthesizes the latest advances in remote monitoring technology in anesthesia, clarifies its unique value relative to existing reviews, and provides practical guidance for clinical translation and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.