ArticleBMC psychology2026
Moral decision-making in real and sacrificial contexts: a pilot study on social cognition in mild cognitive impairment.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective social decision-making requires understanding interpersonal dynamics involving moral content, a process supported by social cognition. When this ability is impaired, as in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), individuals may struggle to act appropriately, reducing social engagement and accelerating decline.The study investigated moral decision-making and social cognition in individuals with MCI and healthy controls (N = 40; 20 per group). Participants completed tasks assessing Theory of Mind (ToM), emotion attribution, social situation understanding, and moral/conventional distinctions. Moral decisions were measured using interactive scenarios (sacrificial, real-life moral, and neutral), recording choices and response times (RTs). Additional measures included cognitive reserve, social engagement, and perceived social isolation.Results showed that individuals with MCI performed significantly worse than controls in identifying normative behaviours, with no group differences in other social cognition domains. Both groups made similar choices in moral decision-making tasks. However, individuals with MCI exhibited longer response times in morally salient scenarios, while no group differences emerged in neutral scenarios. This pattern may tentatively suggest greater processing demands in morally relevant contexts. Additionally, individuals with MCI reported lower levels of cognitive reserve and social engagement.These findings underscore the importance of assessing moral decision-making in clinical populations to support autonomy and social inclusion in ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.