Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381040›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2026

Evaluation of ACMG/AMP guidelines for classifying APC variants in Korean patients with suspected familial adenomatous polyposis.

Seo-Jin Park, Namsoo Kim, Dongju Won, Saeam Shin, Kyung-A Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seo-Jin Park *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Namsoo Kim *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dongju WonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Saeam ShinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-A LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. KAL1119@yuhs.ac.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAPC is the most frequently mutated gene in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Recent advancements in sequencing technologies and the introduction of the 2024 APC-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines have reshaped the diagnostic landscape for hereditary polyposis syndromes.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed APC variant data from 425 Korean patients clinically suspected of FAP between 2006 and 2020. Genetic testing included direct sequencing, targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and mutant enrichment with 3'-modified oligonucleotide PCR. Variants were reclassified using the 2024 APC-specific ACMG/AMP criteria.

resultsPathogenic or likely pathogenic APC variants were detected in 166 of 425 patients (39.1%). Twenty-one novel truncating mutations were identified. The application of the 2024 APC-specific ACMG/AMP criteria led to the reclassification of 13 variants, with 2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic and 7 likely benign. Nine patients showed evidence of APC mosaicism.

conclusionThis is the first large-scale study to evaluate the clinical utility of the 2024 APC-specific ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, enabling the reclassification of previously designated variants of uncertain significance into more definitive categories. The detection of mosaic variants emphasizes the need for higher sequencing depth. Our results support the integration of NGS and further diagnostic evaluation into APC variant testing.

Identifiers

PMID42381040
PMCPMC13587274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.