ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
Ethical challenges in reproductive donation tourism: a qualitative study of clinicians' perspectives in Iran.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReproductive donation tourism is a complex phenomenon with profound ethical implications which also affects Iran. However, studies in this context are limited. This study explores the ethical challenges associated with donor-based reproductive tourism from the perspective of Iranian clinicians, focusing on how they interpret these challenges within Iran's legal, religious, and institutional context.
methodsA conventional content analysis study was used to explore the ethical concerns in donation-related reproductive tourism perceived by clinicians in Iran. Twenty-two experts who were actively involved in the field of infertility treatment, were recruited purposefully from ART centers in Tehran and the Ministry of Health of Iran in 2025. Data collection was done through in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Analysis was carried out by MAXQDA.24 software and the Graneheim and Lundman approach. A conceptual model was also proposed to explain the interaction of challenges involved in this phenomenon.
resultsData analysis resulted in four themes: (1) Legal and structural heterogeneity of countries; (2) Clinical uncertainty and physical and genetic concerns in reproductive donation; (3) Synergistic moral, psychological, identity, social, and cultural-religious implications and secrecy in reproductive donation; (4) Justice, commodification, exploitation and demand in fertility tourism. These challenges can raise concerns related to justice, exploitation, commodification, and the rights of donor-conceived children.
conclusionThis treatment method in Iran is surrounded by multidimensional and interwoven concerns that mutually reinforce each other. These findings indicate that reproductive donation tourism is not merely a legal and clinical issue but one that raises significant ethical concerns, requiring careful consideration of fundamental principles of medical ethics in both national and international policy-making. Therefore, developing and sharing integrated international legal and ethical frameworks to support ethically responsible and regulated reproductive care, is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.